Couldn't agree more here. Technical challenges are more about the "doing" than the "thinking" part. And when we separate "thinkers" from "doers", we go back to a scientific model where someone does analysis and the other person is a merely translates the specification into code.
IMHO It's still appealing for some companies because it sells the illusion of reducing the turnover costs since all you gotta do is replace a cog in your machine.
Couldn't agree more here. Technical challenges are more about the "doing" than the "thinking" part. And when we separate "thinkers" from "doers", we go back to a scientific model where someone does analysis and the other person is a merely translates the specification into code.
IMHO It's still appealing for some companies because it sells the illusion of reducing the turnover costs since all you gotta do is replace a cog in your machine.