Thanks for sharing, Dave! Just got the book. Your post reminded me of the 4 stages of competence, and I think it fits the current scenario where LLM's are becoming both a boost to perceived productivity and a barrier to acquired knowledge.
I think you can also argue that LLMs are in a sense the ultimate in tacit knowledge, and that brings with it the same issues are you get dealing with any expert: you don't know when they are wrong because you have no personal context.
Thanks for sharing, Dave! Just got the book. Your post reminded me of the 4 stages of competence, and I think it fits the current scenario where LLM's are becoming both a boost to perceived productivity and a barrier to acquired knowledge.
I'll share my comments once I read it! :)
I think you can also argue that LLMs are in a sense the ultimate in tacit knowledge, and that brings with it the same issues are you get dealing with any expert: you don't know when they are wrong because you have no personal context.
I really like this. What is meant by "formal tuition"?
The way many schools and universities teach: an "expert" talking and everyone else listening. Participation begets engagement begets learning....
Again, it's good stuff. Might caution that intuitive incrementing is still descriptive and should be offset by normative assumption vetting.
https://thelaterallens.substack.com/p/invisible-boxes